Membrane monitoring reverse osmosis

Membrane Protection

Increase Water Filtration Membrane Performance

Improve Efficiency and Control Membrane Filtration Cost

Reverse osmosis (RO) membranes have arguably a greater impact on operations than any other water treatment process. They are extremely effective in removing inorganic contaminants but are also highly susceptible to fouling, oxidation and scaling. A lack of precise, real-time monitoring of RO membranes’ health can drive significant costs in the form of biofouling, excessive chemical use, frequent cleaning and maintenance, plant downtime and early membrane replacement.

Reverse osmosis semipermiable membranes

Reverse osmosis membrane open

RO Fouling Expenses

According to a recent study in the scientific journal, Desalination, the cost of RO fouling at one desalination plant in the Netherlands represents approximately 24% of total plant operating expenses. The bulk of that expense is incurred by early replacement of membranes.

How Do RO Membranes Work?

Reverse Osmosis occurs when a semipermeable membrane allows water molecules under high pressure to pass through, while flushing dissolved inorganic compounds to the drain. Cross-flow separates the water into two pathways: permeate and reject.

Water Treatment and Analysis Around RO System

Reverse Osmosis System Diagram

Key:

Applicable to most RO customers

Applicable to fewer RO customers

Filter aid

Prefiltration (optional)

Chlorination

Cartridge filter

Antiscalant

Dechlorination

RO membrane

Biocide and membrane cleaner

Reject

Permeate

RO System Manager Objectives

  • Eliminate particles, ions, molecules to produce water suitable for downstream processes
  • Manage membrane efficiency and performance by cost-efficiently controlling fouling, cleaning and maintenance
  • Prolong membrane lifespan and reliability by managing foulants
  • Respond quickly to source water fluctuations impacting previous objectives.

Dechlorination and Membrane Monitoring

There are many parameters that are important when monitoring RO membrane performance, one of the most critical is chlorine. Chlorination and dechlorination are key steps in nearly all industrial and municipal treatment processes when RO membranes are used. As it is difficult to detect exact levels of chlorine, plant operators will often opt to completely remove all traces of it. While the end result is zero residual chlorine (meeting water quality goals) over-dechlorination can cause a host of unnecessary consequences and expenses along the way.

1

There is the cost associated with the superfluous chemicals used to completely remove chlorine.

2

The absence of chlorine can lead to biofouling, which then requires additional cleaning and maintenance or the use of costly biocides.

3

The efficiency of the membranes is negatively impacted, forcing replacement months sooner than would normally be required.

Example A:

Extend Membrane Life

Many membranes are rated to 1,000 parts per million (ppm)-hours of free chlorine exposure before salts passage doubles. If you expose your first-stage RO to a continuous average of 38 parts per billion (ppb), you will reach 1,000 ppm-hours in 36 months.

If you increase your average exposure by just 10 ppb to 48 ppb, you will reach the same 1,000 ppm-hours in 28.5 months. That means potentially replacing your first-stage RO membranes seven and a half months sooner from an average increase of 10 ppb free chlorine exposure.

Example B:

Reduce Cleaning Costs

Your facility might spend as much as four times the amount cleaning membranes for the same unit of water if not properly maintained, versus a properly maintained system at a quarter of the cost.

Reduce Operating Costs

When membranes foul the costs are substantially higher. Operations could increase by 50% to as much as 100% for a typical plant.

Accurate, Dependable Online Chlorine Monitoring

The Hach® Ultra Low Range CL17sc can detect lower levels of chlorine than ever before, helping plant operators minimize membrane fouling, reduce operational expenses and confidently meet regulatory reporting requirements.

ULR-CL17sc

Ultra Low Range CL17sc Features and Benefits:

Lower limit of detection, quantitation and accuracy:

  • 8 ppb limit of detection
  • Accuracy of ± 5% or ± 0.01 mg/L (whichever is greater)
    from 0 - 4 mg/L; ± 10% from 4 - 5 mg/L
  • Precision of 3 ppb

Cumulative Chlorine Counter™:

  • Track chlorine exposure over time

Applications – Dechlorination, monitor residual chlorine to protect membranes and control product water quality:

  • Control dechlorination process efficiently
  • Prolong RO membrane life
  • Meet strict residual chlorine limits

Shop Now

Accurate, Dependable Grab Sample Chlorine and Sulfite Monitoring

Hach’s DR1300 FL fluorescence tests can detect lower levels of chlorine and sulfite than ever before, helping plant operators minimize membrane fouling, reduce operational expenses and confidently meet water quality requirements.

DR1300 FL Features and Benefits:

Lower limit of detection with increased accuracy through simplified tests:

  • Total Chlorine = 3-100 ppb measuring range

  • Free Chlorine = 2-100 ppb measuring range

  • Sulfite = 6-500ppb measuring range
    • Precision (95% confidence interval)
      50.0 ± 1.0 µg/L - Free and Total Chlorine
    • Precision (95% confidence interval)
      250.0 ± 5.0 µg/L Sulfite

New technology bringing easy-to-perform ultra-low range tests for total chlorine, free chlorine and sulfite

  • New sulfite tests remove the guessing from how much to dose in your sodium bisulfite dechlorination!

  • Cost savings and risk reductions

Applications – Physical and Chemical Dechlorination, monitor residual chlorine to protect membranes and control product water quality

  • Control dechlorination process efficiently

  • Prolong RO membrane life

Shop Now

DR 1300 FL

Manufactured by Pyxis®

Featured Products for Membrane Monitoring

View Product Resources

View Products and Services

Your selection

  • Membrane Protection

Market Class

Parameter

Product Type

Product Sub-Type

Application

Topic

Topic Detail

Method/Technology

Method Number

Location

Industry

Loading

1 Jafari, M. et al. “Cost of fouling in full-scale reverse osmosis and nanofiltration installations in the Netherlands.” Desalination, March 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114865

2 SAMCO. “How Much Does It Cost to Properly Maintain Membrane Filtration Systems vs. Treat Fouled Membranes?” February 2019. https://www.samcotech.com/cost-to-properly-maintain-membrane-filtration-systems

Have Questions? We Have Answers!

Contact us for tech support, service, sales, or to get a quote.